I found this module quite difficult, as my
essay wasn’t an easy one to try and illustrate, but I feel my visual work has
developed a lot since the start of the project. Before I knew my essay topic I
began by visually exploring the city in different ways, depicting it in various
states of change; I was drawn to do this after researching into the photography
of Eugene Atget. This then left me a bit confused as to go next but after a
lecture on ‘Cities and Film’ I was inspired to look more at the effects the
city has on the individual, to explore the relationship between people and the
built environment; this then lead me onto psychology which surrounds
architecture and environmental design. I was pleased with my essay, I think I
touched on a lot of interesting areas and points but I don’t feel I was
analytical enough when exploring those ideas. I didn’t have a proper
conclusion, which should have rounded up all my different concepts and applied
them all to one particular environment; this would have made it a lot stronger.
I am happy with the rest of the essay as I used a broad range of sources and
have created a starting point for further interesting investigation.
I feel my practical work went really well, I
intertwined my aesthetic processes from other modules into this project and
made a book I am happy with. My visual work changed a lot from just pen and ink
drawings to handmade textures mixed with digital, which I think looks much more
exciting. I managed to create quite atmospheric pieces with the sharp,
protruding illustrations of environment, which come across quite oppressive,
especially the front and back cover. I think my process of photo-shopping
previously used mono-print textures into shapes worked really well to create a
rather bleak city landscape; one which communicates it’s control over its
inhabitants. The use of puppetry was, I feel, an interesting concept and
contrast to the sterile and flat environments. I wanted to convey the city’s
people as flimsy and easily manipulated by their surroundings, which I think
they do, the handmade, loose watercolour on the figures against the harsh
background was necessary to convey this. However, I feel like I could have
executed it better, I liked how the figures sat on the environments, with the
slight shadow and use of thread worked well, but I think the actual figures
needed more development – they looked a little too messy and out of place. I
liked the use of textures for their clothes but the face and body drawings were
quite weak and not very defined; they needed a bit more character in the
face.
I think my strengths during this module have
been my execution of research for both theory and practical. I made sure to
gather my research from a wide range of sources which included going out and
doing observational drawing and photography to then work from, this definitely
helped to inspire ideas. I also feel my synergy between my essay and practical
work has been strong; my essay looked into how the environment manipulates our
behaviour and then my practical illustrated the different ways we can be
manipulated but also focused more on the social constraints placed on us to
change how we act, which is a focused development on my essay. My weaknesses were
that my essay wasn’t very focused towards the end and definitely needed a
better conclusion; also the visual development in terms of my final figures
needed more attention. I also feel I could have thought more about interesting
ways to format my book, maybe finding a way in which the layout of the book
could help convey my points, also with the font as I didn’t put much
consideration into that either which I think shows. I feel that context is
lacking slightly as well, although the book is in context with my essay, I
haven’t thought about where my book exists in the real world, or who the audience
is, which are really important considerations I need to focus more on next
time.
Overall, I am happy with my outcomes for this project and the direction it took, I feel I have definitely opened up an interesting topic to explore. I’m unsure about whether I want to look into architecture again as I think I have had that as my CoP essay/project topic two years in a row now, but I do like the idea of exploring social constraints that are placed on us and the various ways we are controlled in society, I think that could possibly be an subject to start looking into for CoP 3.
Overall, I am happy with my outcomes for this project and the direction it took, I feel I have definitely opened up an interesting topic to explore. I’m unsure about whether I want to look into architecture again as I think I have had that as my CoP essay/project topic two years in a row now, but I do like the idea of exploring social constraints that are placed on us and the various ways we are controlled in society, I think that could possibly be an subject to start looking into for CoP 3.





















